Articles
2012.09.04 08:45

Unified system of Romanization

(*.32.156.100) 조회 수 133679 추천 수 0 댓글 0
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄
?

단축키

Prev이전 문서

Next다음 문서

크게 작게 위로 아래로 댓글로 가기 인쇄

Unified system of Romanization

By Robert J. Fouser

Quietly, ever so quietly, displeasure with the current Romanization system of Korean is seeping into the news. 

The issue stands with Chinese characters as the most contested Korean-language issue of the last 50 years. It stirs passions and sets groups of language experts against each other. Why is this so, and what, if anything, can be done about it? 

The heart of the problem is ownership of language. Koreans naturally believe that they ``own" the Korean language and frequently refer to it as ``our language" (uri mal). In the postcolonial context of recent Korean history, the sense of ownership over language is magnified as memories of forced use of Japanese during harsh colonial rule from 1910-1945 are passed down to younger generations. 

The last years of colonial rule were particularly severe as Japan forced Koreans to adopt Japanese names and banned the use of Korean in public. After liberation in 1945, those who fought to protect it during the colonial period were considered national heroes. 

Ownership of Korean is closely tied to national identity and the collective trauma of Japanese colonial rule. Roman letters are not Korean, but Romanization of Korean immediately becomes a matter of ownership because Korean is ``our language." 

The problem, of course, is that non-Koreans, particularly native speakers of languages that use Roman letters, believe that they have ownership over them and, by extension, ownership over the Romanization of Korean. Non-Koreans thus believe they should have the larger voice in deciding how to Romanize Korean. 

The battle lines are clear: Koreans believe they should own Romanization by developing and promoting a ``Korean system"; non-Koreans believe that they should have the final say on the matter. This explains why many non-Koreans continue to reject the revised system of Romanization that the South Korean government adopted in 2000. 

As with most ownership disputes, the Romanization debate is fraught with complications. The most obvious complication is that Koreans on both sides of the Demilitarized Zone have developed two official systems of Romanization. In 1992, a unified system was developed, but it failed to take hold on either side. Today, North Korea uses a variant of the McCune-Reischauer system that was the official system in South Korea from 1984-2000.
             @be fraught with: be filled with

With much of Romanization referring to proper nouns that both Korean states share, the existence two systems make it difficult for organizations in third countries to choose a ``Korean" system. This explains why the McCune-Reischauer system and close variants of it remain the de facto standard in Korean studies outside of Korea. 
             @variant: something different although it is related to it
             
@de facto: virtually

For all its faults, it is neutral and has a long history of wide use. It remains that standard for nearly all scholarly books and articles outside Korea. Journalism and many websites, interestingly, commonly use the South Korean system to refer to South Korea and the North Korean system to refer to North Korea. 

Another complication, of course, is the McCune-Reischauer system itself. The system was developed in 1938 by George M. McCune, a Pyongyang-born member of the McCune missionary family, and Edwin O. Reischauer, a famous 20th-century scholar on Japanese history.

For many Korean language scholars, the ``foreign" origins of the system during the Japanese colonial period are a metaphor for loss of ownership. Dropping the McCune-Reischauer system thus symbolizes the recovery of ownership of Korean. For average users, of course, the diacritic mark used in the McCune-Reischauer system is a major inconvenience, particularly in the digital age. 
             @diacritic: a sign placed above or below a character or letter to indicate that it has a different phonetic value

Clearly, the current situation is unacceptable. Romanization divides Koreans between themselves and between Korea and the rest of the world. Visceral claims of ownership between Koreans and non-Koreans make dispassionate discussion difficult. The historically dominant system is outdated and inconvenient. 
             @visceral: feel very deeply and find it difficult to control or ignore

The beginning of a solution starts with ownership. Koreans need to update "our language" to include non-Koreans. The multiculturalization of Korean society is challenging traditional definitions of national identity. This more inclusive attitude will eventually weaken notions of language ownership. Non-Koreans need to recognize the needs that Koreans have for Romanization and the inconvenience of the orthodox McCune-Reischauer system. 

All of which leads back to the 1992 proposal that both Koreas made after five years of negotiations. The proposal was wonderfully simple: the South Korean proposal for vowels and the North Korean proposal for consonants. The resulting system was an inclusive ``Korean" system that was enough like McCune-Reischauer to vie for dominance. The way forward, then, is for both Koreans to sit down again and revive negotiations based on the 1992 proposal. 
             @vie: compete

In the end, only the legitimacy and shared ownership of a unified system can bring an end to the Romanization wars.

 

?

  1. Hogeon's English Presentation - 2012.11.12.

    의욕 가득했던 2012년ㅋㅋㅋ 추억 돋네... 5년 전의 나 그리고 지금의 나 지난 5년 간 나는 나의 꿈을 향해 몇 발자국이나 내딛었는가?
    Date2017.02.01 CategoryEnglish Views5846
    Read More
  2. No Image

    When Capitalists Cared

    When Capitalists Cared By HEDRICK SMITH Published: September 2, 2012 IN the rancorous debate over how to get the sluggish economy moving, we have forgotten the wisdom of Henry Ford. In 1914, not long after the Ford Motor Company came out with the Mode...
    Date2012.09.04 CategoryArticles Views182939
    Read More
  3. No Image

    Unified system of Romanization

    Unified system of Romanization By Robert J. Fouser Quietly, ever so quietly, displeasure with the current Romanization system of Korean is seeping into the news. The issue stands with Chinese characters as the most contested Korean-language issue of ...
    Date2012.09.04 CategoryArticles Views133679
    Read More
  4. No Image

    August 23, 2012 - How Much Food Do We Throw Out?; West Nile Virus Outbreak

    How Much Food Do We Throw Out?; West Nile Virus Outbreak Aired August 23, 2012 - 04:00:00 ET CARL AZUZ, CNN ANCHOR: Some of this food can end up on your plate, but how much of it could eventually end up in the trash? The answer might surprise you. I`m...
    Date2012.08.24 CategoryCNN Students News Views58598
    Read More
  5. No Image

    No sea change for East Sea

    No sea change for East Sea By Andrew Salmon Talk about news of earth-shaking international importance. In Monaco last week, the International Hydrographic Organization ― the body that sets official geographic place names for maps ― rejected Korea’s de...
    Date2012.08.24 CategoryArticles Views67266
    Read More
  6. No Image

    Full-Time Work Means Better Health for Mothers

    Full-Time Work Means Better Health for Mothers By KJ DELL'ANTONIA “This is not about advice for women,” the University of Akron sociologist Adrianne M. Frech said of her latest research, which showed that women who work steadily full-time after the bi...
    Date2012.08.24 CategoryArticles Views24375
    Read More
  7. No Image

    Drop the Pasta, Dad, and No One Gets Hurt

    Drop the Pasta, Dad, and No One Gets Hurt By MATT RICHTEL Published: August 21, 2012 They sit there, five little pasta shells, nestled in a shallow bath of melted butter and Parmesan: the remains of dinner for my toddler son and daughter. I cannot hel...
    Date2012.08.24 CategoryArticles Views34384
    Read More
  8. No Image

    US-China rivalry over Africa

    US-China rivalry over Africa Frank Ching Africa has become a major theater in the global rivalry between China and the United States. This was evident during Hillary Clinton’s visit to the continent, during which she spread the message of democracy an...
    Date2012.08.24 CategoryArticles Views161681
    Read More
  9. No Image

    Pyongyang blowback

    Pyongyang blowback By Andrew Salmon In 2001, following the 9/11 terrorist attack, a term used by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency entered common currency. Throughout the 1980s, the Mujahideen, that loose conglomeration of Afghan tribal forces and ...
    Date2012.08.23 CategoryArticles Views83744
    Read More
  10. No Image

    Wet Dogs Shake Dry in Milliseconds

    Wet Dogs Shake Dry in Milliseconds If you’ve ever bathed a dog, you know firsthand how quickly a drenched pup can shake water off. Now researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology have found that furry mammals can shake themselves 70 percent dry...
    Date2012.08.23 CategoryArticles Views31843
    Read More
  11. No Image

    August 20, 2012 - Strike in South African Mine Turns Deadly; The One-Square-Meter House

    Strike in South African Mine Turns Deadly; The One-Square-Meter House Aired August 20, 2012 - 04:00:00 ET CARL AZUZ, CNN ANCHOR: Whether you are starting a new week or a new school year, we welcome you to CNN STUDENT NEWS. Hello, I`m Carl Azuz. Today,...
    Date2012.08.22 CategoryCNN Students News Views28264
    Read More
  12. No Image

    Falling off a high cliff?

    Falling off a high cliff? By Robert Klemkosky # US govn’t doesn’t concern their fiscal problem, they are not likely to talk about it for re-election. Falling off a cliff may be harmful to one’s health or even life if the cliff is high enough. In the U...
    Date2012.08.22 CategoryArticles Views33675
    Read More
Board Pagination Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
/ 7